Comparative Validation and Misclassification Diagnosis of 30-Meter Land Cover Datasets in China
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Xu, Xiaolin3; Li, Dan3; Liu, Hongxi2; Zhao, Guang1; Cui, Baoshan3; Yi, Yujun3; Yang, Wei3; Du, Jizeng3 |
刊名 | REMOTE SENSING
![]() |
出版日期 | 2024-11-01 |
卷号 | 16期号:22页码:27 |
关键词 | land cover maps inconsistency evaluation accuracy assessment misclassification diagnosis |
DOI | 10.3390/rs16224330 |
产权排序 | 3 |
英文摘要 | Land cover maps with high accuracy are essential for environmental protection and climate change research. The 30-meter-resolution maps, with their better resolution and longer historical records, are extensively utilized to assess changes in land cover and their effects on carbon storage, land-atmosphere energy balance, and water cycle processes. However, current data products use different classification methods, resulting in significant classification inconsistency and triggering serious disagreements among related studies. Here, we compared four mainstream land cover products in China, namely GLC_FCS30, CLCD, Globeland30, and CNLUCC. The result shows that only 50.34% of the classification results were consistent across the four datasets. The differences between pairs of datasets ranged from 21.10% to 37.53%. Importantly, most inconsistency occurs in transitional zones among land cover types sensitive to climate change and human activities. Based on the accuracy evaluation, CLCD is the most accurate land cover product, with an overall accuracy reaching 86.98 +/- 0.76%, followed by CNLUCC (81.38 +/- 0.87%) and GLC_FCS30 (77.83 +/- 0.80%). Globeland30 had the lowest accuracy (75.24 +/- 0.91%), primarily due to misclassification between croplands and forests. Misclassification diagnoses revealed that vegetation-related spectral confusion among land cover types contributed significantly to misclassifications, followed by slope, cloud cover, and landscape fragmentation, which affected satellite observation angles, data availability, and mixed pixels. Automated classification methods using the random forest algorithm can perform better than those that depend on traditional human-machine interactive interpretation or object-based approaches. However, their classification accuracy depends more on selecting training samples and feature variables. |
WOS关键词 | ACCURACY ASSESSMENT ; RANDOM FOREST ; SAMPLING DESIGNS ; CLASSIFICATION ; PRODUCT ; URBAN ; CONSISTENCY ; SELECTION ; DYNAMICS ; PATTERNS |
资助项目 | National Key Research and Development Program of China ; National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars[52025092] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[41930970] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[42475198] ; National Natural Science Foundation of China[52109074] ; [2023YFC3209003] ; [2022YFC3202001] ; [2022YFF1301801] |
WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geology ; Remote Sensing ; Imaging Science & Photographic Technology |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001366053000001 |
出版者 | MDPI |
资助机构 | National Key Research and Development Program of China ; National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars ; National Natural Science Foundation of China |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/211477] ![]() |
专题 | 生态系统网络观测与模拟院重点实验室_外文论文 |
通讯作者 | Du, Jizeng |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Adv Inst Nat Sci, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China 3.Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Cont, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Xu, Xiaolin,Li, Dan,Liu, Hongxi,et al. Comparative Validation and Misclassification Diagnosis of 30-Meter Land Cover Datasets in China[J]. REMOTE SENSING,2024,16(22):27. |
APA | Xu, Xiaolin.,Li, Dan.,Liu, Hongxi.,Zhao, Guang.,Cui, Baoshan.,...&Du, Jizeng.(2024).Comparative Validation and Misclassification Diagnosis of 30-Meter Land Cover Datasets in China.REMOTE SENSING,16(22),27. |
MLA | Xu, Xiaolin,et al."Comparative Validation and Misclassification Diagnosis of 30-Meter Land Cover Datasets in China".REMOTE SENSING 16.22(2024):27. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。