Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, human preferences and future scenario simulations to ecological security patterns: A novel methodology for reconciling conflicting ecological functions
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Wu, Qing3,4; Cao, Yu2,4; Zhang, Yangjian1; Su, Dan4; Fang, Xiaoqian4 |
刊名 | APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
![]() |
出版日期 | 2025-03-01 |
卷号 | 176页码:103534 |
关键词 | Multi-scenario simulation OWA model Ecological security pattern Trade-offs PLUS model Yangtze river delta |
ISSN号 | 0143-6228 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103534 |
产权排序 | 4 |
文献子类 | Article |
英文摘要 | Ecological security patterns (ESPs) are critical for identifying priority protection areas, enhancing ecological flows, and supporting cross-regional sustainable development. However, traditional ESP frameworks often neglect ecosystem service (ES) trade-offs and human preferences, leading to conflicts among ecological functions and unsustainable spatial patterns. This study proposes a novel OWA-ESP-PLUS framework to optimize ecological protection areas by integrating ES trade-offs and human preferences. The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) model, coupled with GIS, simulated the spatial distribution of priority protected areas under varying decision-making risks. The optimal scenario, with the highest average protection efficiency and low human trade-offs was selected. Ecological sources, corridors and pinch points were then identified to establish a crossregional ESP. To assess its adaptability for future ecological security, the PLUS model simulated three 2030 scenarios: business as usual (BAU), priority economic development (PED), and priority ecological protection (PEP). Results showed that priority protection areas in the optimal scenario promoted 55.9% conservation efficiency while maintaining a balanced spatial configuration. The ESP, consisting of 24 ecological sources, 51 ecological corridors, and 25 pinch points, enhanced landscape connectivity, reduces fragmentation, and minimizes disturbance risk. This framework bridges ES conservation with sustainable spatial management, offering a transferable methodology for ecological planning worldwide. |
URL标识 | 查看原文 |
WOS关键词 | LAND-USE ; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION ; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ; CIRCUIT-THEORY ; CONNECTIVITY ; MODEL ; RISK |
WOS研究方向 | Geography |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:001422427600001 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER SCI LTD |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/212302] ![]() |
专题 | 拉萨站高原生态系统研究中心_外文论文 |
通讯作者 | Cao, Yu |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 2.Zhejiang Univ, Land Acad Natl Dev, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China; 3.Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Fac Social Sci, Dept Geog, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China; 4.Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Dept Land Management, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China; |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wu, Qing,Cao, Yu,Zhang, Yangjian,et al. Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, human preferences and future scenario simulations to ecological security patterns: A novel methodology for reconciling conflicting ecological functions[J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY,2025,176:103534. |
APA | Wu, Qing,Cao, Yu,Zhang, Yangjian,Su, Dan,&Fang, Xiaoqian.(2025).Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, human preferences and future scenario simulations to ecological security patterns: A novel methodology for reconciling conflicting ecological functions.APPLIED GEOGRAPHY,176,103534. |
MLA | Wu, Qing,et al."Linking ecosystem services trade-offs, human preferences and future scenario simulations to ecological security patterns: A novel methodology for reconciling conflicting ecological functions".APPLIED GEOGRAPHY 176(2025):103534. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。