Enhanced forest management rather than afforestation has dominated China's carbon sink over recent decades
文献类型:期刊论文
| 作者 | Zhang, Mengyu1,12,13; He, Honglin1,11,13; Brandt, Martin10; Zhang, Li1,11,13; Ren, Xiaoli1,11,13; Tong, Xiaowei9,10; Yu, Shiyong8; Lv, Yan7; Yu, Kailiang1,6; Huang, Yuanyuan1 |
| 刊名 | COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
![]() |
| 出版日期 | 2026-01-08 |
| 卷号 | 7期号:1页码:153 |
| DOI | 10.1038/s43247-025-03176-2 |
| 产权排序 | 1 |
| 文献子类 | Article |
| 英文摘要 | Human activities substantially reduce net ecosystem productivity (NEP) globally, yet debates remain over the contributions of land-use and land-cover change (LUCC), such as afforestation (afforestation and reforestation), versus non-LUCC ecosystem management (EM; e.g., forest tending, mountain forest restoration, and fire control). Here, we developed an analytical framework by harmonizing structurally consistent remote sensing-driven and climate-driven ecological process models to quantify the dynamic effects of LUCC and eight EM types on NEP from 2001 to 2021 in China by isolating anthropogenic effects from global change factors. We found that the NEP, which averaged 327 Tg C yr-1 across the 9.6x106 km2 country, increased at a rate of 16.1 Tg C yr-2. Forest management, including forest tending (5.53 Tg C yr-2) and mountain forest restoration (2.7 Tg C yr-2), primarily drove carbon sink increases. Although afforestation induced greater NEP growth per unit area, the total effect of forest management-due to its much greater coverage-was 4.14 times greater than that of afforestation (1.6 Tg C yr-2). Notably, the acceleration of China's NEP after 2010 was closely associated with intensified forest management efforts. Moreover, the rate of NEP gains caused by forest tending investment (8.54 kg C yr-2 $-1) was much greater than that caused by afforestation investment (0.25 kg C yr-2 $-1). Our findings highlight the critical role of forest management in cost-effectively enhancing the carbon sink. This has important implications for global forest management strategies and achieving net-zero emissions. |
| URL标识 | 查看原文 |
| WOS关键词 | ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECTS ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS ; VEGETATION DYNAMICS ; BUDGET ; SEQUESTRATION ; RESPONSES ; IMPACTS ; TRENDS ; KARST |
| WOS研究方向 | Environmental Sciences & Ecology ; Geology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001687378400001 |
| 出版者 | SPRINGERNATURE |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/221079] ![]() |
| 专题 | 生态系统网络观测与模拟院重点实验室_外文论文 |
| 通讯作者 | He, Honglin |
| 作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing, Peoples R China; 2.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Math Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China 3.Ludong Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Yantai, Shandong, Peoples R China; 4.Mississippi State Univ, Geosyst Res Inst, High performance Comp Collaboratory, Starkville, MS USA; 5.Zhejiang A&F Univ, Coll Jiyang, Zhuji, Peoples R China; 6.Princeton Univ, High Meadows Environm Inst, Princeton, NJ USA; 7.Shandong Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn & Spatial Geomat, Zibo, Shandong, Peoples R China; 8.Jiangsu Normal Univ, Sch Geog Geomat & Planning, Xuzhou, Peoples R China; 9.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Subtrop Agr, Key Lab Agroecol Proc Subtrop Reg, Changsha, Peoples R China; 10.Univ Copenhagen, Dept Geosci & Nat Resource Management, Copenhagen, Denmark; |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Zhang, Mengyu,He, Honglin,Brandt, Martin,et al. Enhanced forest management rather than afforestation has dominated China's carbon sink over recent decades[J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT,2026,7(1):153. |
| APA | Zhang, Mengyu.,He, Honglin.,Brandt, Martin.,Zhang, Li.,Ren, Xiaoli.,...&Yu, Guirui.(2026).Enhanced forest management rather than afforestation has dominated China's carbon sink over recent decades.COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT,7(1),153. |
| MLA | Zhang, Mengyu,et al."Enhanced forest management rather than afforestation has dominated China's carbon sink over recent decades".COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT 7.1(2026):153. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。

