How Does Culture Become an Asset? Property Rights Design and Internalised Governance on China's Urban Peripheries
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | Chen, Linhao2; Hemakumara, Gpts3; Liu, Zhigao1,2 |
| 刊名 | SUSTAINABILITY
 |
| 出版日期 | 2025-11-20 |
| 卷号 | 17期号:22页码:10403 |
| 关键词 | urban transformation multi-scalar interaction peri-urban governance art districts (China) state entrepreneurialism |
| DOI | 10.3390/su172210403 |
| 产权排序 | 1 |
| 文献子类 | Article |
| 英文摘要 | Research on culture-led urban change in China has shifted from inner-city clusters to peripheral zones where formal planning meets managed informality, yet two gaps remain. First, artistic production continues to be interpreted through a leasing lens that positions artists as temporary occupiers. Second, land is analysed largely at the macro scale of municipal supply and branding, while internal property rules and meso-level governance are overlooked. This paper mobilises the concept of assetisation to show how precarious cultural spaces become rule-bound assets through property-rights design. Fieldwork in Chengdu's Blue Roof Art District draws on qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews, policy and registration documents, and on-site observation. We examine which resources are assetised, how this occurs, and with what effects on publicness and spatial form. Our findings show that planning endorsement, the transfer of collective construction land for cultural use, and title registration with mortgageability codify eligibility, use and transfer. Studios are converted into owner-occupied assets tied to land value. Governance shifts from direct administrative control to asset management by owners and the site operator. While production stabilises and overt conflict declines, public interfaces narrow and enclave risks intensify when city priorities change. Empirically, the paper demonstrates how property-rights design operates as a meso-level governance tool that sets explicit trade-offs between stability and openness. Theoretically, it links producers to land value, bridging macro land regimes with micro political practice in urban peripheries and informing urban policy-making that prioritises sustainability. |
| URL标识 | 查看原文 |
| WOS关键词 | CREATIVE INDUSTRIES ; SPECIAL-ISSUE ; LAND-USE ; CITY ; CITIES ; SPACES ; ART ; DISTRICT ; CLUSTERS ; ECONOMY |
| WOS研究方向 | Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| WOS记录号 | WOS:001624451900001 |
| 出版者 | MDPI |
| 源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/219486]  |
| 专题 | 区域可持续发展分析与模拟院重点实验室_外文论文 |
| 通讯作者 | Liu, Zhigao |
| 作者单位 | 1.Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China; 3.Univ Ruhuna, Fac Humanities & Social Sci, Dept Geog, Matara 81000, Sri Lanka; |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Chen, Linhao,Hemakumara, Gpts,Liu, Zhigao. How Does Culture Become an Asset? Property Rights Design and Internalised Governance on China's Urban Peripheries[J]. SUSTAINABILITY,2025,17(22):10403. |
| APA | Chen, Linhao,Hemakumara, Gpts,&Liu, Zhigao.(2025).How Does Culture Become an Asset? Property Rights Design and Internalised Governance on China's Urban Peripheries.SUSTAINABILITY,17(22),10403. |
| MLA | Chen, Linhao,et al."How Does Culture Become an Asset? Property Rights Design and Internalised Governance on China's Urban Peripheries".SUSTAINABILITY 17.22(2025):10403. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：地理科学与资源研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。