热门
Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Fang, Yi-ping1![]() ![]() |
刊名 | ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
![]() |
出版日期 | 2014-03-01 |
卷号 | 38页码:225-235 |
关键词 | Livelihood strategy Livelihood capital Sensitivity Mountain settlement Upper reaches of the Minjiang River |
ISSN号 | 1470-160X |
通讯作者 | Yi-ping Fang |
英文摘要 | Livelihood strategies denote the range and combination of activities and choices made by households. Some research has focused on the potential impacts of sustainable livelihood, and only a few studies have begun considering sensitivity of livelihood strategies. Based on the gradient altitude and resettlement project, mountain settlements are classified into four types: the high-mountain settlement, the semi-mountain settlement, the river valley settlement and the resettlement area. Using semi-structured interviews, we have defined the farm and non-farm livelihood strategies as dependent variables, while the natural, human, physical, financial, and social capitals are considered as independent variables in order to model the relationship between livelihood strategies and livelihood capitals. In term of different settlements, we estimate the sensitivity of farm and non-farm livelihood strategies to livelihood capitals. The results indicate that natural and human capitals exhibited a positive correlation with the farm livelihood strategy, although the effect varies with the four types of settlements. Financial and social capitals are the catalyst for driving non-farm activities. Our findings suggest that no size fits all solutions to the livelihood strategy issues, and only livelihood capitals will be helpful in the long term if they are complemented by relative policies that enhance capital capacity as well as increase access to capitals. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
WOS标题词 | Science & Technology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine |
类目[WOS] | Biodiversity Conservation ; Environmental Sciences |
研究领域[WOS] | Biodiversity & Conservation ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology |
关键词[WOS] | POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGIES ; FARM-LEVEL EVIDENCE ; LAND-USE PATTERNS ; RURAL LIVELIHOODS ; INCOME DIVERSIFICATION ; BRAZILIAN AMAZON ; MALAWI ; REGION ; SCALE ; ALLEVIATION |
收录类别 | SCI ; SSCI |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000330497600025 |
公开日期 | 2013-12-18 |
源URL | [http://ir.imde.ac.cn/handle/131551/6631] ![]() |
专题 | 成都山地灾害与环境研究所_山区发展研究中心 成都山地灾害与环境研究所_数字山地与遥感应用中心 |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China 2.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China 3.Sichuan Acad Social Sci, Chengdu 610071, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Fang, Yi-ping,Fan, Jie,Shen, Mao-ying,et al. Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China[J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,2014,38:225-235. |
APA | Fang, Yi-ping,Fan, Jie,Shen, Mao-ying,&Song, Meng-qiang.(2014).Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China.ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS,38,225-235. |
MLA | Fang, Yi-ping,et al."Sensitivity of livelihood strategy to livelihood capital in mountain areas: Empirical analysis based on different settlements in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River, China".ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 38(2014):225-235. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:成都山地灾害与环境研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。