Comparisons of CME Morphological Characteristics Derived from Five 3D Reconstruction Methods
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Feng, L.1,2![]() |
刊名 | SOLAR PHYSICS
![]() |
出版日期 | 2013 |
卷号 | 282期号:1页码:221-238 |
关键词 | Corona, structures Coronal mass ejections, initiation and propagation |
ISSN号 | 0038-0938 |
通讯作者 | Feng, L (reprint author), Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Dark Matter & Space Astron, Purple Mt Observ, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China. Email: lfeng@pmo.ac.cn ; binhest@mps.mpg.de ; marilena@geodin.ro |
英文摘要 | We compare different methods to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) coronal mass ejection (CME) morphology. The explored methods include geometric localisation, mask fitting, forward modelling, polarisation ratio, and local correlation tracking plus triangulation. These five methods are applied to the same CME event that occurred on 7 August 2010. Their corresponding results are presented and compared, especially in their propagation direction and spatial extent in 3D. We find that the mask fitting and geometric localisation methods produce consistent results. Reconstructions including three-view observations are more precise than reconstructions done with only two views. Compared to the forward modelling method, in which an a priori shape of the CME geometry is assumed, the mask fitting has more flexibility. The polarisation ratio method makes use of the Thomson scattering geometry. We find that spatially the 3D CME derived from the mask fitting lies mostly in the overlap region obtained with the polarisation method using data from STEREO. In addition, the mask fitting can help resolve the front/back ambiguity inherent in the polarisation ratio method. However, the local correlation tracking plus triangulation did not show consistent results with the other four methods. This method performed poorly, primarily because the two STEREO spacecraft had a large angular separation. Under these circumstances, it is difficult to identify points taken from independent images that correspond to the same physical feature. Excluding the local correlation tracking method, the latitude of the CME's centre of gravity derived from the other methods deviates within 1(a similar to), and the longitude differs within 19 degrees. |
WOS标题词 | Science & Technology ; Physical Sciences |
学科主题 | Astronomy & Astrophysics |
类目[WOS] | Astronomy & Astrophysics |
研究领域[WOS] | Astronomy & Astrophysics |
关键词[WOS] | CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS ; GEOMETRIC LOCALIZATION ; STEREO ; VIEWPOINTS ; MISSION ; LASCO |
收录类别 | SCI |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000312132800013 |
公开日期 | 2014-01-08 |
源URL | [http://libir.pmo.ac.cn/handle/332002/9884] ![]() |
专题 | 紫金山天文台_宇宙伽马暴、中子星及相关物理研究团组 |
作者单位 | 1.Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Dark Matter & Space Astron, Purple Mt Observ, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China 2.Max Planck Inst Sonnensyst Forsch, D-37191 Katlenburg Lindau, Germany 3.Acad Romana, Inst Geodynam, Bucharest 020032 37, Romania 4.Royal Observ Belgium, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Feng, L.,Inhester, B.,Mierla, M.. Comparisons of CME Morphological Characteristics Derived from Five 3D Reconstruction Methods[J]. SOLAR PHYSICS,2013,282(1):221-238. |
APA | Feng, L.,Inhester, B.,&Mierla, M..(2013).Comparisons of CME Morphological Characteristics Derived from Five 3D Reconstruction Methods.SOLAR PHYSICS,282(1),221-238. |
MLA | Feng, L.,et al."Comparisons of CME Morphological Characteristics Derived from Five 3D Reconstruction Methods".SOLAR PHYSICS 282.1(2013):221-238. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:紫金山天文台
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。