中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
What’s in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Liu, Chao ; Tardif, Twila ; Mai, Xiaoqin ; Gehring, William J. ; Simms, Nina ; Luo, Yue-Jia
刊名HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
出版日期2010
卷号31期号:11页码:1786-1801
通讯作者邮箱Twila@umich.edu
关键词event-related potentials mandarin Chinese categorization typicality effect N300 N400 morphological and orthographical processing linguistic relativity hypothesis crosscultural
产权排序3
通讯作者Twila Tardif
合作状况国际
中文摘要The linguistic relativity hypothesis proposes that speakers of different languages perceive and conceptualize the world differently, but do their brains reflect these differences? In English, most nouns do not provide linguistic clues to their categories, whereas most Mandarin Chinese nouns provide explicit category information, either morphologically (e g, the morpheme "vehicle" che1 (sic) in the noun "train" huo3che1 (sic)) or orthographically (e g, the radical "bug" chong2 (sic) in the character for the noun "butterfly" hu2dre2 (sic)). When asked to judge the membership of atypical (e g, train) vs typical (e.g., car) pictorial exemplars of a category (e g, vehicle), English speakers (N = 26) showed larger N300 and N400 event-related potential (ERP) component differences, whereas Mandarin speakers (N = 27) showed no such differences. Further investigation with Mandarin speakers only (N = 22) found that it was the morphologically transparent items that did not show a typicality effect, whereas orthographically transparent items elicited moderate N300 and N400 effects In a follow-up study with English speakers only (N = 25), morphologically transparent items also showed different patterns of N300 and N400 activation than nontransparent items even for English speakers Together, these results demonstrate that even for pictorial stimuli, how and whether category information is embedded in object names affects the extent to which typicality is used in category judgments, as shown in N300 and N400 responses.
学科主题认知神经科学
收录类别SCI
资助信息NSF:BCS-0350272; NIH:TW000035-07S1; Ministry of Education (PCSIRT): IRT0710; NSF China: 30930031; Center for Human Growth and Development
原文出处http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.20974/abstract
语种英语
公开日期2014-06-11
源URL[http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/10078]  
专题心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010)
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Liu, Chao,Tardif, Twila,Mai, Xiaoqin,et al. What’s in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages[J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING,2010,31(11):1786-1801.
APA Liu, Chao,Tardif, Twila,Mai, Xiaoqin,Gehring, William J.,Simms, Nina,&Luo, Yue-Jia.(2010).What’s in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages.HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING,31(11),1786-1801.
MLA Liu, Chao,et al."What’s in a name? Brain activity reveals categorization processes differ across languages".HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING 31.11(2010):1786-1801.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:心理研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。