Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?
文献类型：期刊论文
| 作者 | DING Jielan（丁洁兰）1,2 ; ROUSSEAU Ronald3,4
|
| 刊名 | chinese journal of library and information science
 |
| 出版日期 | 2015-06-27 |
| 卷号 | 8期号:2页码:1-10 |
| 关键词 | Nature Science Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Chinese articles Mann-Whitney test |
| 通讯作者 | ronald rousseau (email: ronald.rousseau@kuleuven.be). |
| 中文摘要 | purpose: we want to contribute to the evaluation of chinese research, focusing on contributions in top journals. design/methodology/approach: using a mann-whitney test we investigate if contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america (pnas) by chinese or american authors only, i.e. articles for which all authors have a chinese or an american address, have a different citation potential. findings: there is no reason to state that chinese and american contributions in these top journals have a different citation potential. research limitations: because of the small numbers involved we were not able to make a distinction between publications in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america. practical implications: these results suggest that the better chinese research results are of a similar level as those by american colleagues. |
| 英文摘要 | purpose: we want to contribute to the evaluation of chinese research, focusing on contributions in top journals. design/methodology/approach: using a mann-whitney test we investigate if contributions in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america (pnas) by chinese or american authors only, i.e. articles for which all authors have a chinese or an american address, have a different citation potential. findings: there is no reason to state that chinese and american contributions in these top journals have a different citation potential. research limitations: because of the small numbers involved we were not able to make a distinction between publications in nature, science or the proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america. practical implications: these results suggest that the better chinese research results are of a similar level as those by american colleagues. |
| 学科主题 | 新闻学与传播学 ; 图书馆、情报与文献学 |
| 收录类别 | 其他 |
| 原文出处 | http://www.chinalibraries.net |
| 语种 | 英语 |
| 源URL | [http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/7806]  |
| 专题 | 文献情报中心_Journal of Data and Information Science_Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science-2015 |
| 作者单位 | 1.National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3.Information and Library Science (IBW), University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp B-2000, Belgium 4.Department of Mathematics, KU Leuven, Leuven B-3000, Belgium |
| 推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | DING Jielan,ROUSSEAU Ronald. Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?[J]. chinese journal of library and information science,2015,8(2):1-10. |
| APA | DING Jielan,&ROUSSEAU Ronald.(2015).Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?.chinese journal of library and information science,8(2),1-10. |
| MLA | DING Jielan,et al."Do Chinese and American contributions in top journals have an equal citation potential?".chinese journal of library and information science 8.2(2015):1-10. |
入库方式： OAI收割
来源：文献情报中心
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。