Cultural Usability Tests – How Usability Tests Are Not the Same All over the World
文献类型:专著章节, 文集论文
学科主题 | 工业与组织心理学 |
作者 | Torkil Clemmensen1; Qingxin Shi1; Pradeep Yammiyavar3; Jyoti Kumar2; Huiyang Li2; Xianghong Sun3 |
发表日期 | 2007 |
出处 | Usability and Internationalization. HCI and Culture |
其他责任者 | Nuray Aykin |
页码 | 281-290 |
出版者 | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
出版地 | Berlin |
关键词 | Usability test think aloud cultural usability field study |
英文摘要 | The cultural diversity of users of technology challenges our methods for usability evaluation. In this paper we report on a multi-site, cross-cultural grounded theory field study of think aloud testing in seven companies in three countries (Denmark, China and India). The theoretical model that emerges from the data suggests that the production of a usability problem list is multi-causal and subject to cultural variations. Even the way usability problems are experienced by test participants may be different. In the discussion we outline practical guidelines for a test that is more sensitive towards cultural usability. |
语种 | 英语 |
源URL | [http://ir.psych.ac.cn/handle/311026/14283] ![]() |
专题 | 心理研究所_中国科学院心理研究所回溯数据库(1956-2010) |
作者单位 | 1.Department of Informatics, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark 2.Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India 3.Inst. of psychology, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Torkil Clemmensen,Qingxin Shi,Pradeep Yammiyavar,et al. Cultural Usability Tests – How Usability Tests Are Not the Same All over the World. 2007. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:心理研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。