中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
首页
机构
成果
学者
登录
注册
登陆
×
验证码:
换一张
忘记密码?
记住我
×
校外用户登录
CAS IR Grid
机构
工程热物理研究所 [2]
长春光学精密机械与物... [1]
采集方式
OAI收割 [3]
内容类型
期刊论文 [2]
会议论文 [1]
发表日期
2011 [1]
1992 [2]
学科主题
筛选
浏览/检索结果:
共3条,第1-3条
帮助
条数/页:
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
排序方式:
请选择
题名升序
题名降序
发表日期升序
发表日期降序
提交时间升序
提交时间降序
作者升序
作者降序
Roughness analysis of optical surfaces by X-ray scattering (EI CONFERENCE)
会议论文
OAI收割
2011 International Conference on Electronics and Optoelectronics, ICEOE 2011, July 29, 2011 - July 31, 2011, Dalian, China
作者:
Chen B.
;
Chen B.
收藏
  |  
浏览/下载:29/0
  |  
提交时间:2013/03/25
A grazing incidence x-ray scattering (XRS) method
Order perturbation theory (FOPT)
is stated briefly and an experimental facility based on an improved X-ray diffraction has been introduced
which can work with high performance. The x-ray scattering distributions of two super smooth silicon samples measured at the incidence angle 0.2 degree
as the x-ray wavelength is 0.154 nm
have been given and analyzed by the FOPT to give information about the surface profiles. As a comparison
the root mean square (RMS) surface roughness
grey-scale maps and one-dimensional power spectral density (1D PSD) have been derived from the atomic-force microscope (AFM) data. The results evaluated by FOPT are in good agreement with that of AFM
which indicates that x-ray scattering method is a practical characterization for the investigation of super smooth surfaces. 2011 IEEE.
A Model for Flooding Prediction in Circular Tubes
期刊论文
OAI收割
JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 卷号: 1, 期号: 3, 页码: 166,177
G.P. Celata1
;
M. Cumo1
;
T. Setaro1
;
S. Banerjee2
收藏
  |  
浏览/下载:23/0
  |  
提交时间:2013/03/13
mechanistic model
flooding
comparison with experimental data
A Model for Flooding Prediction in Circular Tubes
期刊论文
OAI收割
JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 卷号: 1, 期号: 3, 页码: 166,177
作者:
G.P. Celata1
;
M. Cumo1
;
T. Setaro1
;
S. Banerjee2
  |  
收藏
  |  
浏览/下载:24/0
  |  
提交时间:2013/03/13
Mechanistic Model
Flooding
Comparison With Experimental Data