中国科学院机构知识库网格
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institutional Repositories Grid
Comparison of two fractal interpolation methods

文献类型:期刊论文

作者Fu Y(傅洋); Zheng ZY(郑泽宇); Xiao R(肖睿); Shi HB(史海波)
刊名Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
出版日期2017
卷号469页码:563-571
关键词Fractal Surface Modeling The Midpoint Displacement Method The Weierstrass–mandelbrot Method Autocorrelation Analysis
ISSN号0378-4371
产权排序1
英文摘要

As a tool for studying complex shapes and structures in nature, fractal theory plays a critical role in revealing the organizational structure of the complex phenomenon. Numerous fractal interpolation methods have been proposed over the past few decades, but they differ substantially in the form features and statistical properties. In this study, we simulated one- and two-dimensional fractal surfaces by using the midpoint displacement method and the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method, and observed great differences between the two methods in the statistical characteristics and autocorrelation features. From the aspect of form features, the simulations of the midpoint displacement method showed a relatively flat surface which appears to have peaks with different height as the fractal dimension increases. While the simulations of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method showed a rough surface which appears to have dense and highly similar peaks as the fractal dimension increases. From the aspect of statistical properties, the peak heights from the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot simulations are greater than those of the middle point displacement method with the same fractal dimension, and the variances are approximately two times larger. When the fractal dimension equals to 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8, the skewness is positive with the midpoint displacement method and the peaks are all convex, but for the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method the skewness is both positive and negative with values fluctuating in the vicinity of zero. The kurtosis is less than one with the midpoint displacement method, and generally less than that of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method. The autocorrelation analysis indicated that the simulation of the midpoint displacement method is not periodic with prominent randomness, which is suitable for simulating aperiodic surface. While the simulation of the Weierstrass–Mandelbrot fractal function method has strong periodicity, which is suitable for simulating periodic surface.

WOS关键词TIME-SERIES ; COMPLEXITY ; PROFILES ; GEOMETRY ; SURFACE ; MODEL ; SEA
WOS研究方向Physics
语种英语
WOS记录号WOS:000392793500055
资助机构Program for Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y5AA100A01).
源URL[http://ir.sia.cn/handle/173321/19719]  
专题沈阳自动化研究所_数字工厂研究室
通讯作者Fu Y(傅洋); Zheng ZY(郑泽宇)
作者单位1.Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
2.Key Laboratory of Network Control System, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
3.Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Fu Y,Zheng ZY,Xiao R,et al. Comparison of two fractal interpolation methods[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2017,469:563-571.
APA Fu Y,Zheng ZY,Xiao R,&Shi HB.(2017).Comparison of two fractal interpolation methods.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,469,563-571.
MLA Fu Y,et al."Comparison of two fractal interpolation methods".Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 469(2017):563-571.

入库方式: OAI收割

来源:沈阳自动化研究所

浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。