Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography
文献类型:期刊论文
作者 | Wang HW(王洪伟); Liao XH(廖新华); Ma XG(马显光); Li ZQ(李长青); Han JD(韩建达)![]() |
刊名 | INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
![]() |
出版日期 | 2013 |
卷号 | 47期号:4页码:352-356 |
关键词 | Electrical resistance electromyography pedicle screw percutaneous pedicle screw |
ISSN号 | 0019-5413 |
产权排序 | 3 |
通讯作者 | 周跃 |
中文摘要 | Background: Although stimulus evoked electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to confirm the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. There are no studies to differentiate between solid screws and hollow screws to the electrical resistance of pedicle screws. We speculate that the electrical resistance of the solid and hollow pedicle screws may be different and then a potential source of error with stimulus-evoked EMG may happen. Materials and Methods: Resistance measurements were obtained from 12 pedicle screw varieties (6 screws of each manufacturer) across the screw shank based on known constant current and measured voltage. The voltage was measured 5 times at each site. Results: Resistance of all solid screws ranged from 0.084 Omega to 0.151 Omega (mean = 0.118 +/- 0.024 Omega) and hollow screws ranged from 0.148 Omega to 0.402 Omega (mean = 0.285 +/- 0.081 Omega). There was a significant difference of resistance between the solid screws and hollow screws (P < 0.05). The screw with the largest diameter no matter solid screws or hollow screws had lower resistance than screws with other diameters. No matter in solid screws group or hollow screws group, there were significant differences (P < 0.05) between the 5.0 mm screws and 6.0 mm screws, 6.0 mm screws and 7.0 mm screws, 5.0 mm screws and 7.0 mm screws, 4.5 mm screws and 5.5 mm screws, 5.5 mm screws and 6.5 mm screws, 4.5 mm screws and 6.5 mm screws. The resistance of hollow screws was much larger than the solid screws in the same diameter group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Hollow pedicle screws have the potential for high electrical resistance compared to the solid pedicle screws and therefore may affect the EMG response during stimulus-evoked EMG testing in pedicle screw fixation especially in minimally invasive percutaneous pedical screw fixation surgery. |
WOS标题词 | Science & Technology ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine |
类目[WOS] | Orthopedics |
研究领域[WOS] | Orthopedics |
关键词[WOS] | LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION ; INTERNAL-FIXATION ; PLACEMENT ; SPINE ; COMPLICATIONS ; ACCURACY ; EMG |
收录类别 | SCI |
资助信息 | Source of Support: The Chinese National High Technology Research and Development Program (2012BAI14B00) and the foundation of state key laboratory of robotics (2011-O01), |
语种 | 英语 |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000323619000005 |
公开日期 | 2013-12-27 |
源URL | [http://ir.sia.cn/handle/173321/14052] ![]() |
专题 | 沈阳自动化研究所_机器人学研究室 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Wang HW,Liao XH,Ma XG,et al. Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography[J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS,2013,47(4):352-356. |
APA | Wang HW,Liao XH,Ma XG,Li ZQ,Han JD,&Zhou Y.(2013).Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS,47(4),352-356. |
MLA | Wang HW,et al."Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography".INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS 47.4(2013):352-356. |
入库方式: OAI收割
来源:沈阳自动化研究所
浏览0
下载0
收藏0
其他版本
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。